EVALUATION
It will consist in two different ways:
FINAL MARK: | Teacher evaluation (70%)+ Self evaluation (30%) |
TEACHER EVALUATION
A. Evaluation of the oral exposition (task 1) and the practical exposition (task 2)
ITEMS |
|
Sobresaliente |
Notable |
Aprobado |
Insuficiente |
Speaks clearly |
|
Speaks slow and clearly all the time |
Speaks slow and clearly almost all the time |
Sometimes speaks clearly, and sometimes speak too fast |
Bad pronunciation. Speaks so quick and sometimes stops. |
Tone of voice |
|
Speaks loud enough to be listened by everyone. |
Speaks loud enough to be listened by almost everyone. |
Speaks loud. |
Speaks so low, so people can’t listen properly. |
Vocabulary |
|
Use a proper vocabulary, with new words and definitions. |
Use a proper vocabulary, with few new words and some definitions. |
Use a proper vocabulary but don’t include none new word or definition. |
Is unintelligible. |
Posture |
|
Correct posture, correct visual contact, the speaker looks chilled and confident. |
Correct posture and correct visual contact. |
Correct posture. |
Bad posture, no visual contact. |
Contents |
|
Great knowledge of the contents. |
Good knowledge of the contents. |
Good knowledge of almost all the contents. |
Bad knowledge of the contents. |
Comprehension |
|
Be allowed to ask all the possible questions of the contents. |
Be allowed to ask almost all the possible questions of the contents. |
Be allowed to ask some questions of the contents. |
Don’t be allowed to ask questions of the contents. |
Appearance |
|
Very good appearance, very visual. |
Correct appearance, visual. |
Correct appearance but not very attractive |
No elaboration, is not visual. |
B. Evaluation of the way to follow (task 3)
ITEMS |
|
Sobresaliente |
Notable |
Aprobado |
Insuficiente |
Map reading |
|
Great comprehension of the different elements of a map. |
Good comprehension of the different elements of a map. |
Regular comprehension of the different elements of a map. |
No comprehension of the different elements of a map. |
Predictability |
|
Can predict lots of different challenges and solve them. |
Can predict some different challenges and solve them. |
Can predict some of different challenges but not how to solve them. |
Can´t predict different challenges |
Safety |
|
Takes in count the safety during all walk. |
Takes in count the safety during almost all walk. |
Takes in count the safety during some parts of the walk. |
No safety. |
C. Video Evaluation (Task 4)
ITEMS |
|
Sobresaliente |
Notable |
Aprobado |
Insuficiente |
Idea |
|
The group know clear what they want to show during the video. |
The group know clear enough what they want to show during the video. |
The group made a brain storming for making the video, but they are not clear. |
The group have no idea of what they want to show. |
Contents |
|
The video have all the contents learned during the tasks. |
The video have almost all the contents learned during the tasks. |
The video have part of the contents learned during the tasks. |
The video don’t have enough contents learned during the tasks. |
Teamwork |
|
The video shows a great teamwork. |
The task are related among themselves |
Can appreciate some collaboration on the global appearance of the work. |
Individualistic work. No relation between the tasks. |
SELF-EVALUATION
ITEMS |
Sobresaliente |
Notable |
Aprobado |
Insuficiente |
|
Group contributions |
The group had worked on a similar way. |
The group had worked together but on different levels. |
Almost all group members had worked and finished their job. |
Only some members had worked. |
|
Common start |
The common start had helped the teamwork. |
The common start had helped to solve some doubts. |
There was no conflicts, but people had worked on same level. |
There was some conflicts and arguments during the work. |
|
Autonomy |
All problems were solved by the group. |
Almost all problems were solved by the group. |
The teacher didn’t helped the group so often. |
The group needed constant supervision by the teacher. |